WebSep 9, 2009 · Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Holding: Political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, and the government may not keep corporations or unions from spending … WebThe best known of those cases is Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , a 2010 decision that said the government can’t prohibit corporations or unions from making independent expenditures for or against individual political candidates.

McCutcheon v. FEC - Wikipedia

WebCitizens United has a constitutional claimthe Act violates the First Amendment , because it prohibits political speech. The Government has a defensethe Act may be enforced, consistent with the First Amendment , against corporations. Whether the claim or the defense prevails is the question before us. northern virginia mhi

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010)

WebThe decision in this historic case – Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission – overturns a century of campaign finance law. The court overruled two existing Supreme Court decisions. In Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, the court held that the government can limit for-profit corporations to the use of PACs to fund express ... WebDec 12, 2024 · January 21, 2024 will mark a decade since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , a controversial decision that reversed … WebCitizens United v. Federal Election Comm'n: Limiting independent expenditures on political campaigns by groups such as corporations, labor unions, or other collective entities … northern virginia metro line map